
AI-generated summary
Labor Lawyer Guide, run by Asano Sogo Law Office, conducted an online survey of 300 people in their 20s to 60s about the line between "guidance" and "power harassment" in the workplace.
At what point does "guidance" in the workplace become "power harassment"? According to a survey conducted by the Labor Lawyer Guide, operated by Asano Sogo Law Office, the most common behavior considered to be power harassment was telling the person, ``Maybe this job isn't for you'' (86.0%).
When asked about their experiences of experiencing or seeing or hearing about power harassment at work, a total of 82.7% answered that they had experienced or heard of power harassment (41.7%) and that they had experienced it themselves (41.0%). Only 16.3% answered "Never."
The most frequently cited behavior that ``I think is power harassment'' was ``Telling the person that he or she might not be suitable for this job'' (86.0%), followed by ``It's not urgent, but contacting the person via chat after hours or on holidays'' (76.7%), and third place was ``Encouraging the person to join a drinking party'' (68.3%).
On the other hand, regarding actions that ``I think are within the scope of guidance'', the top responses were ``Delegating less difficult work to the person while they continue to make mistakes'' (87.7%) and ``Setting goals slightly higher than the person's ability'' (81.3%).
When asked about the dividing line between "guidance" and "power harassment," the most frequently cited factor was "strongness of language/tone" (87.0%). This was followed by ``Is there a business necessity'' (64.7%) and ``Frequency/persistence'' (62.3%).
I asked them if they ever felt that their words or actions might be interpreted as power harassment. As a result, 51.6% answered ``Yes'' (total of ``Often'' and ``Sometimes''), 21.7% said ``I don't have the position or opportunity to provide guidance or caution,'' 15.0% said ``Not at all,'' and 10.7% said ``Almost never.''
The most common response when experiencing or witnessing power harassment was ``I couldn't do anything'' (25.7%), which, when combined with ``I put up with it'' (21.7%), rose to 47.4%.
14.0% said they ``consulted with someone close to them, such as a family member or colleague,'' and 10.3% said ``I refuted or protested, or thought about changing jobs or resigning.'' 5.3% of respondents said they ``consulted with the company (supervisor, human resources, consultation desk),'' and only 2.0% said they ``consulted with someone outside the company (Labor Standards Office, lawyer, etc.).''
The survey was conducted online among 300 people in their 20s to 60s. The period is June 12th to 19th.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that in fiscal 2025, it had implemented 5,990 cases of guidance requiring overtime work of up to 45 hours per month. Although the guidance was canceled across the board from September, guidance was continued in 6,717 cases regarding overtime work exceeding 80 hours per month. Investigations of workplaces suspected of long working hours found a total of 12,811 cases that led to guidance.

Job interviews often ask personal questions such as children, marriage plans, chronic illnesses, and whether or not you have developmental disabilities, but in many cases interviewers are unable to explain the purpose of the questions. According to a survey by the Nippon Foundation, 76.5% of people who did not have a disability certificate and were looking for a job in the general category had no experience of disclosing their diagnosis results, and the most common reason for this was fear of being rejected.

On the 1st, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that it will no longer provide guidance to companies that are allowed to work more than 45 hours per month based on labor-management agreements, but require them to limit their working hours to 45 hours or less across the board. The government will shift to supervision and guidance based on the actual situation at the workplace and measures to ensure health and welfare.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare's plan to end the 45-hour overtime requirement per month starting in September has been met with opposition from the Rengo and Karoshi defense groups, which deny work-style reform and warn against deregulation.

The minimum wage revision for 2026 will determine the amount for 30 prefectures. Seventeen prefectures exceeded the Central Council's guidelines, and the margin of increase was smaller than last year. There appears to be a easing trend due to the government's de facto postponement of the national average target of 1,500 yen and concerns about excessive competition to raise prices.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare's plan to end the uniform guidance on overtime work of up to 45 hours per month from September has been met with a series of backlash and protest statements from the Rengo and Karoshi lawyers, and concerns have been voiced saying that ``the lives and health of workers must be protected.''