
AI-generated summary
Personal questions are asked during job interviews to learn about the applicant's personality and the possibility of long-term employment, but in many cases the interviewer is unable to explain the purpose of the question.
"Do you have any children? Are you planning to get married?"
"Do you have any chronic illness?"
"Do you have any developmental disorders?"
Have you ever been asked or asked a question like this in a job interview?
I want to know about the applicant's personality. I want to find out if the person is someone who can work for a long time. We want to prevent mismatches after joining the company.
I don't mean any harm to the interviewer. As a result of trying to "get to know the other person better," I often end up asking questions. Therein lies the essence of the problem in job interviews.
What evaluation will you use the information obtained from the questions?
In my experience, there are many cases where interviewers themselves are unable to clearly explain the ``intent'' of the question.
In July, the Nippon Foundation released a survey of people diagnosed with developmental disorders and mental illnesses. 76.5% of those who did not have a disability certificate and were looking for a job in the general category had no experience in disclosing the results of their diagnosis at a medical institution to a company. The most common reasons for this were the experience of being rejected due to disclosure, or fear of being rejected.
You might think, ``If you don't want to tell me, just ask during the interview,'' but the story is not that simple.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that in fiscal 2025, it had implemented 5,990 cases of guidance requiring overtime work of up to 45 hours per month. Although the guidance was canceled across the board from September, guidance was continued in 6,717 cases regarding overtime work exceeding 80 hours per month. Investigations of workplaces suspected of long working hours found a total of 12,811 cases that led to guidance.

On the 1st, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that it will no longer provide guidance to companies that are allowed to work more than 45 hours per month based on labor-management agreements, but require them to limit their working hours to 45 hours or less across the board. The government will shift to supervision and guidance based on the actual situation at the workplace and measures to ensure health and welfare.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare's plan to end the 45-hour overtime requirement per month starting in September has been met with opposition from the Rengo and Karoshi defense groups, which deny work-style reform and warn against deregulation.

The minimum wage revision for 2026 will determine the amount for 30 prefectures. Seventeen prefectures exceeded the Central Council's guidelines, and the margin of increase was smaller than last year. There appears to be a easing trend due to the government's de facto postponement of the national average target of 1,500 yen and concerns about excessive competition to raise prices.

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare's plan to end the uniform guidance on overtime work of up to 45 hours per month from September has been met with a series of backlash and protest statements from the Rengo and Karoshi lawyers, and concerns have been voiced saying that ``the lives and health of workers must be protected.''

According to a survey by Asano Sogo Law Office, the act of telling someone in the workplace, ``Maybe you're not suited for this job,'' is considered the most common form of power harassment, and over 80% have experienced power harassment. When asked about the dividing line between guidance and power harassment, the most common answer was ``the strength of the words and tone,'' and when it came to dealing with power harassment, the most common answer was ``I couldn't do anything.''