
A week after Meta agreed in the United States to limit screen time for minors, 59 MEPs wrote to Ursula von der Leyen to demand sanctions against the group under the DSA, due to its addictive design on Facebook and Instagram, deemed harmful to minors and vulnerable adults.
AI-generated summary
The Digital Services Regulation (DSA) was passed by the European Parliament three years ago. A procedure against Meta for non-compliance with the DSA regarding its addictive design was opened in April 2024. In July, Brussels found violations related to infinite scrolling, push notifications and personalized recommendations.
A week after the agreement concluded by Meta in the United States, the shock wave continues in Brussels. 59 MEPs call on Ursula von der Leyen to “sanction Meta without delay”. In a letter sent this Wednesday to the President of the European Commission, the signatories ask her to complete a procedure opened against Meta under the Digital Services Regulation (DSA) in April 2024. “European children are not worth less than American children. It would be unthinkable for them to be less well protected, when we have the most demanding framework in the world. The European Parliament did its job by voting for the DSA three years ago. It’s now up to the European Commission to do its own.” As part of this procedure, Brussels noted last July that the “addictive design” of Instagram and Facebook, with infinite scrolling, push notifications and even personalized recommendations, violated the DSA. The European executive criticizes Mark Zuckerberg's group for not having correctly assessed and limited the risks of addiction that users of the two platforms develop, in particular minors and vulnerable adults. He is not satisfied with the parental controls integrated into Facebook and Instagram, which would be too complicated to manage, nor with the settings to limit teenagers' screen time. At the time, Meta disputed Brussels' preliminary findings, while pledging to work with the Commission to "deliver a safe and positive online environment." Skip the ad Two months later, the 59 European parliamentarians intend to put pressure on the President of the Commission. They ask Ursula von der Leyen for a “decision of non-compliance”, sanctions, “commitments at least equivalent to the concessions obtained in the United States”, and “temporary suspension if Meta persists”. The suspension of a platform, which has been in effect since February 2024, has never been used. “What Meta deems unfounded in Brussels, she proposes to Oakland,” continues Stéphanie Yon Courtin, Renew MEP, who initiated this call. For years, the company explained to us that these measures were disproportionate and technically infeasible. She has just accepted them, under pressure from the American justice system. This agreement demolishes all his arguments.” Restrictive measures On August 26, as part of an amicable agreement, Meta committed to limiting by default, for those under 18, two hours per day on Instagram and Facebook combined, as well as blocking access to the two applications, excluding messaging, from midnight to 6 a.m. Mark Zuckerberg's company, which risked several hundred billion in fines, will have to pay $17 billion to around fifty American states. The day after this agreement, the Commission did not fail to react to the current procedure. “The ball is in Meta’s court” and the group “knows what we expect from them,” declared Thomas Regnier, spokesperson for the European executive. “We have had discussions with Meta since this agreement was announced on the other side of the Atlantic,” he said. “It is a continuous dialogue that we are carrying out in order to offer our children, here in the European Union, at least as good protection,” recalled this spokesperson.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The European Commission will make a non-compliance decision against Meta in the coming weeks.
Likely · Within weeks
Meta could agree to new voluntary restrictions to avoid formal sanctions.
Possible · Within months

Nvidia will take control of the Franco-American artificial intelligence platform Hugging Face for $12.9 billion, according to an announcement made by the leaders of the two companies. This acquisition is part of Nvidia's diversification strategy in the AI ecosystem, while Hugging Face, a specialist in open source AI models, says it wants to remain an open platform despite the operation.

The Trump administration filed a 20-page report in Manhattan federal court arguing that training AI models on copyrighted works does not constitute copyright infringement, as part of the New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI for unauthorized use of its articles. The US government cites its executive order of January 23, 2025 aimed at removing obstacles to American leadership in AI, while the NYT warns that this practice threatens the sustainability of content created by humans and estimates its damage at several billion dollars.

The Minister of Transport, Philippe Tabarot, announced the launch of road tests for Tesla's FSD (Full Self-Driving) system in France, after discussions with Elon Musk. Final approval will be decided at European level in the coming weeks.

Palantir boss Alex Karp warned that France would harm itself by believing it is protecting itself with French companies operating American and Chinese AI, during a G20 meeting in North Carolina, criticizing the replacement of Palantir by ChapsVision for the DGSI.

John Ternus succeeds Tim Cook at the helm of Apple on September 1 after fifteen years of reign, taking over the technology giant with major challenges to overcome.

European sovereignty in artificial intelligence must not rest solely on the start-up Mistral, warned the Minister of the Economy Roland Lescure in San Francisco, pleading for the development of a complete ecosystem.