
Survey commissioned by TV Liberal indicates growth of the Podemos candidate and stability of Hana Ghassan (MDB) at 32%
AI-generated summary
The survey was commissioned by TV Liberal and carried out by the Quaest Institute between September 22 and 25, 2026, with 804 voters aged 16 or over in the state of Pará. The survey includes stimulated and spontaneous surveys, in addition to second round scenarios and government evaluation.
Dr Daniel on the left; and Hana Ghassan, right. — Photo: Reproduction
Quaest research released this Saturday (26) shows how the dispute for the government of Pará is going. The survey was commissioned by TV Liberal.
See below the results of the stimulated survey, in which Quaest shows the list of candidates to the voters interviewed.
Dr Daniel (Podemos): 41% (it was 28% in August)
Hana Ghassan (MDB): 32% (was 27%)
Araceli Lemos (PSOL): 2% (it was also 2%)
Well Macedo (PSTU): 1% (was 2%)
Gal Leite (UP): 1% (was 2%)
Ruth Reis (Democrat): 0% (was not in the previous survey*)
Undecided: 17% (was 29%)
White/null/will not vote: 6% (was 9%)
*Ruth Reis became a candidate for the Democrats after issues related to the electoral domicile of the then candidate, José Moita.
For 72% of voters interviewed in the survey, the choice of candidate is definitive. Another 28% say they can still change their vote until the elections on October 4th.
Quaest interviewed 804 people aged 16 and over between the 22nd and 25th of September. The margin of error is three percentage points, plus or minus, and the confidence level is 95%. The TSE registration number is PA-07042/2026.
Spontaneous survey numbers
Quaest also shows the results of the spontaneous poll, in which the names of the candidates are not shown to voters.
Dr Daniel (Podemos): 23% (it was 14% in August)
Hana Ghassan (MDB): 19% (was 12%)
Araceli Lemos (PSOL): 0% (was 0%)
Gal Leite (UP): 0% (was 0%)
Well Macedo (PSTU): 0% (was 0%)
Ruth Reis (Democrat): 0%
Undecided: 54% (was 69% in August)
Blank/null/will not vote: 2% (was 3%)
2nd round scenarios
The research features a 2nd shift simulation. The data is below:
Dr Daniel (Podemos): 47% (it was 36% in August)
Hana Ghassan (MDB): 36% (it was also 36% in August)
Blank/null/none: 8% (was also 8%)
Undecided: 9% (was 20%)
Main problem of the state
Quaest asked voters what the state's main problem is. See the most cited themes.
Health: 37%
Violence: 12%
Infrastructure: 7%
Unemployment: 5%
Savings: 5%
Corruption: 4%
Education: 3%
Floods: 2%
Poverty/Inequality: 2%
Others: 13%
None: 1%
Don't know or didn't answer: 9%
Candidate rejection rate
Quaest also consulted voters about each of the candidates: if they know them and would vote, if they don't know them or if they know them and wouldn't vote. The most rejected candidates (highest rates of "know and wouldn't vote") are Dr Daniel (Podemos) and Hana Ghassan (MDB).
Dr Daniel (We can)
Knows and would vote: 51% (was 35% in August)
Don't know: 25% (was 44%)
Knows and would not vote: 24% (was 21%)
Hana Ghassan (MDB)
Knows and would vote: 41% (was 33% in August)
Don't know: 27% (was 43%)
Knows and would not vote: 32% (was 24%)
Araceli Lemos (Psol)
Do you know and would vote: 6% (it was 5% in August)
Don't know: 81% (was 82%)
Knows and wouldn't vote: 13% (was 13%)
Well Macedo (PSTU)
Do you know and would vote: 4% (it was 3% in August)
Don't know: 89% (was 90%)
Knows and wouldn't vote: 7% (was 7%)
Ruth Reis (Democrat)
Know and would vote: 3%
Don't know: 90%
Know and wouldn't vote: 7%
Gal Leite (UP)
Knows and would vote: 1% (it was 1% in August)
Don't know: 94% (was 93%)
Knows and wouldn't vote: 5% (was 6%)
Government Approval and Assessment
The survey also shows how the government is evaluated and the approval and disapproval rates.
Hana Ghassan government approval
Approves: 47% (previously 51%)
Disapprove: 25% (was 22%)
Don't know/didn't answer: 28% (was 27%)
Government assessment
Positive: 35% (previously 36%)
Regular: 30% (was 31%)
Negative: 16% (was 13%)
Don't know/didn't answer: 19% (was 20%)
Does Helder deserve to elect a successor?
Yes, it deserves it: 52% (previously 53%)
No: 38% (was 38%)
Don't know/didn't answer: 10% (was 9%)
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Dr Daniel will maintain or increase his lead until the October 4 elections
Likely · Within weeks
Hana Ghassan will face difficulty in overtaking Dr Daniel due to the high rate of 'knows and would not vote'
Possible · Within weeks

Quaest research released on September 26 shows Helder (MDB) with 25% of voting intentions for the Senate in Pará, followed by Delegado Éder Mauro (PL) and Chicão (UNIÃO) with 15% each and Zequinha Marinho (Podemos) with 10%. The survey interviewed 804 people between September 22nd and 25th, with a margin of error of three percentage points.

A Quaest survey released on October 26, 2026 shows that approval of the government of the governor of Pará, Hana Ghassan (MDB), fell from 51% to 47%, while disapproval rose from 22% to 25%. Health is highlighted as the state's main problem by 37% of voters.

Quaest survey released this Saturday (26) shows Lula (PT) with 40% and Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) with 35% in the dispute for the 1st round of Presidency in Pará. Augusto Cury (Avante) has 7%, while Renan Santos (Missão) and Ronaldo Caiado (PSD) have 2% each. The Lula government's approval rating is at 48%.

In the first round of elections scheduled for October 4th, with a possible second round on October 25th, candidates from the PSTU, União Brasil and PSD carried out campaign agendas in Macapá and municipalities in Amapá, including leafleting, podcast recording, meetings, walks and visits to neighborhoods and housing complexes.

A Datafolha survey released on September 26, 2026 reveals that 47% of Brazilians evaluate the work of STF ministers as negative, the highest rate since 2019. Among Lula voters, 32% see the performance as excellent or good, while among Flávio Bolsonaro voters, only 6% have a positive evaluation and 69% a negative evaluation. The proposed Code of Ethics for the STF has 45% support and 33% opposition.

A Datafolha survey carried out in September 2026 with 2,002 voters shows that 38% evaluate the performance of the National Congress as bad or terrible, 18% as excellent or good and 40% as regular. Approval is higher among Lula voters (22%) and lower among Flávio Bolsonaro voters (15%). Negative evaluations are more common among men, with incomes above five minimum wages and in the Southeast.