
The couple was not informed of the letter reminding them of their status in good time
Prince Harry and Meghan were surprised by a letter sent on behalf of King Charles III, which recalled that they are not active members of the royal family and remain private citizens.
AI-generated summary
Prince Harry and Meghan stepped down from their representative duties on behalf of the monarch in January 2020.
A spokesman for Harry and Meghan said the couple, who recently returned to the UK, were "somewhat surprised not to have been informed about the letter in advance" and were not given time to respond.
Sources at Buckingham Palace cited by the BBC claim that Harry and Meghan found out about the letter before it was made public. The BBC claims that it happened an hour before the publication of the letter.
What was on the list?
The letter, sent on behalf of King Charles III, explained that Prince Harry and Meghan, who returned from California last month with their children Archie and Lilibet, are no longer active members of the royal family.
They will still not be able to use the titles "His and Her Royal Highness" and will remain "private citizens," reads a letter sent on behalf of the king by the Lord Chamberlain, one of Buckingham Palace's senior officials.
According to Palace sources, the letter was sent to Prince Harry's team, government institutions, representatives of the armed forces and Lord Viceroys.
A warning signal from Buckingham Palace
The letter made it clear that any engagements made by the Sussexes would be private and they would not represent the royal family.
As the BBC points out, this could be perceived as a kind of warning signal, making it clear that Prince Harry and Meghan's visits should not be treated as royal obligations.
The message from the king emphasized that the position agreed in 2020, when the Sussexes left the UK - the so-called The Sandringham Agreement – still in force.
“It is well known that in January 2020, the Duke and Duchess stepped down from their representative duties on behalf of the Monarch and are no longer active members of the Royal Family,” the letter reads.
The document added: "The Duke and Duchess's charitable work is their personal matter and is undertaken as part of their private responsibilities."
The letter, sent on behalf of the king, also said that "any issues related to operational security should continue to be referred to the appropriate police authorities."
What about Harry and Meghan's protection?
According to the BBC, the security committee, which includes representatives from the Home Office, is meeting this week to discuss how much security should be funded for the Sussexes. Prince Harry has previously complained about the lack of adequate police protection in the UK.
The Executive Committee for the Royal Family and VIPs, known as Ravec, decides on the safety of members of the royal family and public figures.
The Ministry of the Interior does not comment on such decisions and is unlikely to reveal the results of such a meeting.
"The UK Government's security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to release details of these arrangements because it could compromise their integrity and impact on the safety of citizens," a Home Office spokesman said.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The security committee will discuss funding for the Sussexes' security.
Very likely · Within days

Poland expresses solidarity with Spain after the mass influx of migrants to Ceuta and declares readiness to help, but demands a more detailed diagnosis of the events at the turn of July and August 2026 due to discrepancies between the Ceuta authorities and the government in Madrid. Ceuta chief Juan Jesus Vivas accuses Morocco of steering migrants towards the border while Sanchez's government remains cautious. Vivas appeals to the EU to recognize Ceuta and Melilla as European borders, a permanent presence of Frontex and financial assistance. The European Commission remains committed to border security, but is acting cautiously.

CENTCOM reported the destruction of five Iranian tankers in the Persian Gulf as retaliation for IRGC attacks on American ships. In response, Iran attacked the US base in Al-Azrak in Jordan, threatening further attacks on tankers near Kuwait and Bahrain. The conflict is escalating despite the ceasefire, and control of the Strait of Hormuz remains a key point of contention, affecting global oil prices.

On September 6, a snow and ice avalanche in the Bezengi Gorge in the Caucasus killed at least 13 people during mountaineering training of officers of the Russian special services, including the Rosgvardiya. The search for five missing people is ongoing.

On the night from Monday to Tuesday, Russia attacked Kiev with ballistic missiles and drones just after the end of a three-day ceasefire. According to Mayor Vitali Klitschko, at least six people were injured and residential buildings and an educational facility in the Hołosijowska district were damaged. Attacks also took place in Fastov and Boryspil. Ukraine responded with strikes on Saratov, Russia, where people were killed or injured.

On Saturday, nearly 100 members of the Indian organization BAPS visited the Eiffel Tower before the opening of a Hindu temple near Paris. During the visit, female employees were removed from their positions at the request of the delegation, which limited contact with the women. The operator admitted the error and the CGT trade union condemned the action as gender discrimination.

In the first half of 2026, Russia allocated 10.687 trillion rubles (EUR 106 billion) for its army and weapons production, which is 43.8 percent. all federal budget expenditure and 57.3 percent budget revenues - the highest share in history. Military spending increased by 30 percent year-on-year, and secret defense spending amounted to 7.141 trillion rubles, or more than two-thirds of all defense spending. Despite huge investments, progress on the front is slow: according to ISW, occupying the rest of the Donetsk Oblast would take over six years at the current pace. Experts warn that Putin may be misled by inflated reports from the front.